[Paragraph] Stem Cell

I support the Embryonic stem cell. I found stem cell's information, and I made my decision. My decision has some reasons.

First, embryonic stem cell is superior to adult stem cell. Embryonic stem cell is undifferentiated cell, therefore embryonic stem cell changes something. But adult stem cell has limitation. Because adult stem cell can't grow to a large quantity tp cure a disease. And adult stem cell will become special to somebody. So, It has limit.

Second, embryo is not living things. Catholicism thinks that embryonic stem cell is killing living things. The assertion is a simple idea. It's not living things. It is just cell. If it does destruction, it is not killing living things.

Third, embryonic stem cell has possibility to many therapies. Adult stem cell can be used to only contributor. But embryonic stem cell can be used to diverse human beings. Because embryonic stem cell is DNA of exclusion . For example, if the patient hasn't right adult stem cell, they'll find a donor. But humans are being different. It's not easy. Even they found a donor, it don't may have an adverse reaction. But embryonic stem cell is different.

To conclude, from old times, Catholicism prevents the advance of science. Because of we can't develop. However, Catholicism does an obstacle to embryonic stem cell, scientist use it for many patients. Now is 21 century. I'm worried about how long this will prevent the advance of science. Human's future is far yet. We are face up to reality.


cf.

http://www.csa.com/discoveryguides/stemcell/overview.php

http://www.cogforlife.org/embryonic.htm